“We need to clarify who is in charge,” he said. “University presidents and boards need to be fully in charge. Athletic departments need to be in charge of maximizing revenue. But it’s about more than that. If you are part of university environment, your conduct has to be the same as anyone else at that college. Student-athletes have to be able to take advantage of the educational opportunities, and they have to play by the rules. That’s not too much to ask, I don’t think. And supporters have to understand that just because you’re a fan doesn’t mean you’re in charge.”
BY MICHAEL MAROT | THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
INDIANAPOLIS — NCAA President Mark Emmert would like to erase all the tawdry tales from his first full year in office.
On Thursday, Emmert asked university leaders to help him turn the page on a disastrous 2011 that included a child sex abuse scandal at Penn State that overshadowed NCAA violations at a handful of major football programs.
Emmert wants to restore some of college sports’ core principles — choosing education over money, amateurism over professionalism and abiding by the rules rather than ignoring them.
“What we have to do is work together to act on those values, to let the world know which fork in the road we’ve taken so we don’t have the same story line this year that we had last year,” he told about 2,000 delegates at the annual convention, just a few blocks from the NCAA headquarters. “I know we can do it. We can do it in 2012.”
For roughly 30 minutes, Emmert again expressed frustration with the rash of infractions charges, alleged ethical breaches and possible criminal conduct in 2011.
And Emmert made it perfectly clear how upset he was by striking a far different tone Thursday than he did in his first state of the association address last year in San Antonio, Texas.
There, Emmert paraded “model” student-athletes across the stage, a production that even included eventual Heisman Trophy winner Robert Griffin III.
This time, speaking sternly and with few laugh lines, Emmert broadly recounted some of the most damaging phrases he’d heard: College sports is about winning at all costs, it’s all about the money, everybody cheats and the term student-athlete is an oxymoron.
“I’ve heard people say that there are no ethics and no integrity in college sports and the whole system is broken. But here’s the really bad news. There’s truth in some of those criticisms,” Emmert said.
The push for change has already begun.
In October, the Division I Board of Directors approved rules giving conferences the option of paying an additional $2,000 toward athletes’ living expenses and multi-year scholarships that could end the practice of coaches stripping away financial aid based solely on athletic performance.
Both rules have become targets of override measures, and the board is scheduled to consider modifications Saturday. Emmert expects both rules to withstand the challenges, though the stipend could face some modifications.
The NCAA also has approved tougher academic standards, which could lead to postseason ineligibility. Under the new guidelines, last year’s men’s basketball national champion Connecticut would have missed the tournament and also is likely to miss the tourney next year.
Some say the academic reforms still are not tough enough.
“I don’t believe the academic reforms are anything more than a P.R. move because there are too many loopholes in it,” said Ohio University professor David Ridpath, past president of an NCAA watchdog called The Drake Group.
On Wednesday, the Legislative Council also passed a proposal that would tighten the definition of an agent to include third parties. That would eliminate the loophole that allowed Cam Newton to retain his eligibility even after the NCAA determined Newton’s father attempted to shop his son’s services.
The rule could be approved Saturday.
“I think it’s a great start,” he said. “It will go to the board, and I think they’ll put in place, and we’ll see if we get the change we want. If not, we’ll change it.”
It’s only a start.
On Friday, the NCAA has carved out a three-hour session to brief delegates about tougher penalties for infractions, a three-tiered new penalty structure, a quicker enforcement process and the rewriting of the massive 400-plus page rulebook.
Regardless of the changes sure to come in 2012, Emmert and others within the organization understand this process can only work if university presidents and athletic directors are on board.
“I don’t think it has to be sold,” vice president of enforcement Julie Roe Lach said. “What I’ve seen and heard is that there is a collective momentum that we’ve got to do something. I think the time is ripe for change, and not only is it ripe for a change, there’s a need for change.”
What can Emmert do?
He wants to make integrity chic again in college sports.
“We need to clarify who is in charge,” he said. “University presidents and boards need to be fully in charge. Athletic departments need to be in charge of maximizing revenue. But it’s about more than that. If you are part of university environment, your conduct has to be the same as anyone else at that college. Student-athletes have to be able to take advantage of the educational opportunities, and they have to play by the rules. That’s not too much to ask, I don’t think. And supporters have to understand that just because you’re a fan doesn’t mean you’re in charge.”